{"id":200,"date":"2014-05-20T20:27:29","date_gmt":"2014-05-20T20:27:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/citeblog.access-to-law.com\/?p=200"},"modified":"2021-12-11T18:12:55","modified_gmt":"2021-12-11T18:12:55","slug":"pennsylvania-supreme-court-drops-parallel-citation-requirement","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/citeblog.access-to-law.com\/?p=200","title":{"rendered":"Pennsylvania Supreme Court Drops Parallel Citation Requirement"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>West Publishing (now Thomson Reuters) took over publication of the <em>Pennsylvania Reports<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/access-to-law.com\/elaw\/pwm\/reconfiguring_%20precedent.htm#30\">forty years ago<\/a>. The headnotes, key numbers, and other editorial interventions of that series of books have, ever since, been drawn straight from the National Reporter System.\u00a0 However, <em>Pennsylvania Reports<\/em> page and volume numbers remained independent of those that identify Pennsylvania decisions in the <em>Atlantic Reporter<\/em>. Because of that divergence the state\u2019s rules of appellate procedure <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pacode.com\/secure\/data\/210\/chapter21\/s2119.html\">required parallel case citations<\/a> of Pennsylvania decisions. Explaining that this did not impose an unreasonable burden on the bar, the rule&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pacode.com\/secure\/data\/210\/chapter21\/s2119.html\">Official Note<\/a> explained:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Counsel having available the Atlantic Reporter can readily obtain the official citation from cross-reference sheets ordinarily pasted on the flyleaf of each Atlantic Reporter volume; counsel having the official reports available can obtain the Atlantic Reporter citation from cross-references available in <em>Shepard\u2019s Pennsylvania Citations &#8211; Case Edition <\/em>or the <em>National Reporter Blue Book.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>\u201cCross-reference sheets \u2026 pasted on the flyleaf of each Atlantic Reporter volume\u201d! That was a different era. Today, because volume and page number pairs extracted from either reporter will retrieve the cited case from all online research services used by Pennsylvania judges and attorneys the requirement serves no purpose. Last month the Pennsylvania Supreme Court <a href=\"http:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?case=7079638687430305565\">removed it (and the portion of the Official Note quoted above)<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/citeblog.access-to-law.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/image-2471.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-201 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/citeblog.access-to-law.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/image-2471.png\" alt=\"image-2471\" width=\"428\" height=\"145\" srcset=\"https:\/\/citeblog.access-to-law.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/image-2471.png 960w, https:\/\/citeblog.access-to-law.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/image-2471-300x101.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 428px) 100vw, 428px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>No longer will attorneys have to cite to the still nominally \u201cofficial\u201d <em>Pennsylvania Reports<\/em>. It remains to be seen whether Pennsylvania\u2019s appellate judges will <a href=\"http:\/\/scholar.google.com\/scholar_case?case=14843367852850072249\">themselves drop the unnecessary parallel cites<\/a>. Thomson Reuters has slashed the price for a full set of the\u00a0<em>Pennsylvania Reports<\/em> <a href=\"http:\/\/legalsolutions.thomsonreuters.com\/law-products\/Case-Law\/Pennsylvania-State-Reports\/p\/100030097\">from $2,790 to $2,232.00<\/a>.<br \/>\n<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-202 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/citeblog.access-to-law.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/05\/penn_reports.jpg\" alt=\"penn_reports\" width=\"129\" height=\"141\" \/><\/p>\n<p>They do look handsome on the shelf.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>West Publishing (now Thomson Reuters) took over publication of the Pennsylvania Reports forty years ago. The headnotes, key numbers, and other editorial interventions of that series of books have, ever since, been drawn straight from the National Reporter System.\u00a0 However, Pennsylvania Reports page and volume numbers remained independent of those that identify Pennsylvania decisions in [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[13],"class_list":["post-200","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cases","tag-cases-2"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/citeblog.access-to-law.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/citeblog.access-to-law.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/citeblog.access-to-law.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/citeblog.access-to-law.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/citeblog.access-to-law.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=200"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/citeblog.access-to-law.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":204,"href":"https:\/\/citeblog.access-to-law.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200\/revisions\/204"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/citeblog.access-to-law.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=200"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/citeblog.access-to-law.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=200"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/citeblog.access-to-law.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=200"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}